Suckmysound wrote:can someone post the FOV calculation - how much FOV ? dammi forgot how to calculate that i am sure from the review link The aspect ration doesn't matter when calculating diagonal FOV.įantastic work AngelJ - you are my savior. The fault is with Sony HMZ and st1080 - both failed to deliver so far The lack of great 35fov+ Headsets with HDMI is driving me nuts none exists in native SVGA except z800 & headplay I just needed the confirmation that fov is indeed 35 and u did that - thank u Sony HMZ - the design is a scarecrow for me the big semi helmet and the huge control box. Video Q is not the only criteria in my rating system - it also includes optics, 2d/3d inputs, portability,comfort factor so HMZ misses out on comfort/optics/portability - a straight no-no even if someone gives me to own for free. both st1080/hmz in usd$800 league and failures respectively.įatsharks : but then that too much of trouble with battery packs to be used St1080 - too many QC issues and the lame excuses so far! i wonder how many excuses they have up their sleeves to justify their shoddy QC. So the news of new fatshakrk with 800圆00, fov46 disheartened me becox of battery / charger thing. Vuzix is crap - my vr920 crapped out, being out of warranty the company said that they'd service it for usd50/hour if i send them their crap. and vuzix makes very cheap stuff commitment of usd$500-600 for their crap is simply ridiculous and laughable at best. So now i can order this with confidence.Įxit ppl and perceived virtual screen seems that screen is NOT on yr face very close so that also looks good optics-wise but then it'**** and trial again! Mybud : not a killer HMD par se but it fills the void left by hmz/st1080 if gaming is not the focus. The pictures in the following look positive: PalmerTech wrote:Why would you assume it has a good exit pupil? Accupix mybud len cleanup trial#
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |